A sense of security comes from seeing a regular monthly income from your investment portfolio. Especially when one is retired or is dependent on investment income to meet everyday expenses.
In the investment community, bonds are considered second class citizens. Investors are told that holding bond funds is done primarily to reduce the overall portfolio risk of owning stock funds. (You never hear it put the other way—stocks are owned to add some spice to your bond portfolio). At parties, who ever talks about the bond market?
The following are questions I will opine about in future articles:
Is focusing on income different than investing based on asset allocation?
Does an increase in the equity portion of your investment portfolio equate to income from the fixed income portion?
What is the best way to think of stock dividends?
Other than age, when should you be 80 percent or more invested in fixed income securities?
With everyone predicting inflation around the corner, how can you be comfortable with a sizable proportion of your investment portfolio in bonds?
Why don’t more people invest more in bond funds?
What is an appropriate bond fund strategy?
When does investing in a high yield bond fund make sense? And does this answer change if you substitute the term “junk bond fund”?
Investor inquiry—“I don’t really care about asset allocation; I just want my one million dollar portfolio to produce $4,000 of income every month.”
Well, why not construct a portfolio that mimics an annuity, without the costs and fees. And returns the principal to the investor. And earns a 5 percent return in today’s interest rate environment. Can this be done within an acceptable risk profile?
My model portfolio could look like this:
This results in a 90/10 bond/equity mix. The bond funds each have duration of 5.0. Most importantly, the investor can depend on a predictable monthly income stream.
Are the risks unacceptable? Inflation would seem to be the most significant risk with a one percent increase in rates reducing the portfolio by $45,000. Default risk is always an issue with high yield funds.
But for some investors the tradeoffs might seem acceptable. I would argue that this is a preferable approach than to purchase an annuity producing this amount of monthly income. This is primarily because an annuity carries such heavy fees. I just recently talked with a neighbor who paid a 5 percent upfront fee to purchase an annuity from a well known insurance company. Seems like a high price to pay.
By Dan Edinger
Other articles filed under Retirement
February 7, 2018
Yesterday evening, Rockbridge's own Ethan Gilbert, CFA was featured on our local Spectrum news network. Check out the interview below where Ethan discusses the recent market shifts, how these swings can affect your retirement accounts, and how to protect your...
January 24, 2018
This past weekend, the New England Patriots did it again. Down 10 in the 4th, star quarterback Tom Brady orchestrated two scoring drives to pull off another comeback victory. In two weekends, the Pats will try to win their 3rd...
January 23, 2018
Stock Markets Returns from various stock market indices over several periods ending December 31, 2017 are shown below. The past quarter was good for stocks – REITs lagged. Over the past year, returns from stock indices, especially emerging markets, were...
January 19, 2018
Happy New Year! Now that 2017 is a wrap, one of the best presents you can bestow on yourself and your loved ones is the gift of proper preparation for the rest of the year. Want to get a jump-start...
January 16, 2018
As you are likely aware, Congress has recently passed significant changes to the tax law. These changes are effective beginning in tax year 2018, with many of the changes for individuals set to sunset after 2025. The summary below is...